Its her money.

LOL
When corporations raise prices and don’t raise their employees’ pay to compensate, how is the wealth being redistributed then? this happens constantly.
It is redistributed up.
if this continues to occur, the working class starts viewing communism and socialism as more favorable.
That is when the people in power allow the democrats to take control to reassure the people that communism and socialism isn’t more favorable.

It is insurance on their wealth and power.

That way you keep putting your money into the banks, thinking of it as wealth, while you lose about 8% purchasing power a year, while the rich bank owner makes it.

maybe you should open your eyes and view the real system for what it is.

Its like an abusive spouse, that buys you flowers after it has abused you to your limit. Then the Democrats come in to give you some flowers and make things better, so you don’t finally decide to get a divorce.

Because it is easier to explain to his kids that they have a nest egg for the future. We (the tax payers) are looked upon as a source of wealth to be given according to the elitist democrat’s wishes (keeping in mind they have a lot of people with their hands out for supporting the unqualified candidate). This debt must be paid ASAP. Therefore, his own paltry wealth would make no real dent in the cost of paying off that debt. The tax payer, however, has (or so the Dems seem to think) an unlimited wealth that can be spread around.
Remember, he said that it is unfortunate that the Supreme Court had not taken the civil rights cause far enough and used the law to bring about financial equality (communism).
But give him time, and perhaps he will find a way to do what the Supreme court failed to do.

HE IS SPREADING HIS WEALTH. HIS CHILDREN AND THEIR
FAMILIES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO LEAVE HOME.
SO HE WILL HAVE TO LET THEM STAY WITH HIM. THEY WILL
BE PAYING THIS BACK. LOL HE WILL BE RIGHT BACK WHERE’
HE STARTED.

He won’t even give money to his own family members, why would we expect him to give it to anyone else. He is just another one of these hypocritical, self-absorbed, power-hungry politicians.

If I could, I would do that. Yet, I can’t. I have responsibilities that are priorities.

The current debt is what happens when god Speaks to you and go on an adventure such as Nation Building.

Bush doubled the national debt while he was in office. Where were all of the conservatives faux concerns then, hmm?

Shouldn’t they be more concerned as to why McCain is reluctant to tell us how he can capture Bin Liden, a promise he made during the election? Several people have said that since he did not when, that he no longer has to make good on that promise. It would seem that a Christian, and American, would WANT to see him captured ASAP, so that we wouldn’t have to lose any more American lives and treasures. The only people, besides the companies that make billions off of the war, are terrorists. Does that make John McCain a terrorist? That is for you to decide America, but it certainly does not cast him in a patriotic light.

Get real you jealous neocon.

First you know darned well if you have any sense of numbers that Mr. Obama makes $400,000 a year as president. Let’s say for argument’s sake that he has five million dollars. There are three hundred million people in the United States. Bushie and these bailouts will put our debt well over a trillion dollars. Do the math.

Why not have the CEOs of corporations that have shipped out jobs overseas distribute THEIR wealth?? After all thay have taken full advantage of Chinese slave labor (remember Tianenmen Square 1989?) to reap big profits and bust American Unions.

Bush’s tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class over the past eight years. Restoring taxes to the way they were during the Clinton era (remember, when we ELIMINATED the national debt?) will be a big help. Also with the Bush Cheney Regime’s lies to create the war in Iraq the Rethuglicans are the last people to know how to fix the mess they assume no responsibility for despite having control of the legislative and executive branches 2001-2007.

And this so called philanthropy with people’s money (which we are left to assume is your definition of the bailout) is in order to do what the tax cuts, deregulations, banks, and free market society are failing miserably to do on their own, create jobs and keep the ones that exist.

Now, now. Obama, like virtually all Liberals, does not include himself in the category of “Wealthy”. Therefore, he has no wealth to “spread around”.

because he’s the president, your president is always on TV making patriotic speeches that never happen, you should be used to it by now